Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRAX vs PFFRX
NFRAX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRAX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRAX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. NFRAX (1.6B). NFRAX (7.82) and PFFRX (7.49) have matching dividends . NFRAX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: NFRAX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). NFRAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. NFRAX (24.00). NFRAX (2500) and PFFRX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. NFRAX (7.18). NFRAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.64 vs. PFFRX (37.42).
| NFRAX | PFFRX | NFRAX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.69 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.69 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.299 | 3.701 | 89% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 4.96B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.82 | 7.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 7.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.34 | 28.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 37.42 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.40 | 62.86 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement