NFSCF
Price
$11.16
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
SKGR
Price
$11.62
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

NFSCF vs SKGR

Header iconNFSCF vs SKGR Comparison
Open Charts NFSCF vs SKGRBanner chart's image
Enphys Acquisition
Price$11.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$353
CapitalizationN/A
SK Growth Opportunities
Price$11.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NFSCF vs SKGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
NFSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFSCF vs. SKGR commentary
Dec 29, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFSCF is a Buy and SKGR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 29, 2024
Stock price -- (NFSCF: $11.16 vs. SKGR: $11.62)
Brand notoriety: NFSCF and SKGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFSCF: 8% vs. SKGR: 17%
Market capitalization -- NFSCF: $203.67M vs. SKGR: $169.03M
NFSCF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $203.67M. SKGR’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $169.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFSCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NFSCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKGR is a better buy in the long-term than NFSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFSCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SKGR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFSCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SKGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NFSCF and SKGR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NFSCF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SKGR (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

SKGR is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.08% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFSCF($204M) has a higher market cap than SKGR($169M). SKGR has higher P/E ratio than NFSCF: SKGR (35.71) vs NFSCF (24.07). SKGR YTD gains are higher at: 7.394 vs. NFSCF (4.592). NFSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -800.04K vs. SKGR (-2.15M). SKGR has more cash in the bank: 164K vs. NFSCF (43.2K). NFSCF has less debt than SKGR: NFSCF (196K) vs SKGR (5.62M). NFSCF (0) and SKGR (0) have equivalent revenues.
NFSCFSKGRNFSCF / SKGR
Capitalization204M169M121%
EBITDA-800.04K-2.15M37%
Gain YTD4.5927.39462%
P/E Ratio24.0735.7167%
Revenue00-
Total Cash43.2K164K26%
Total Debt196K5.62M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFSCFSKGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
3%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NFSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SKGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMCAX12.84N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth A
FAPHX13.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Healthy Future
FKUTX22.56-0.07
-0.31%
Franklin Utilities A1
TEMUX13.45-0.06
-0.44%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Em Mkts Eq
ECSTX25.77-0.16
-0.62%
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value C

NFSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFSCF has been loosely correlated with LBEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFSCF jumps, then LBEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFSCF
1D Price
Change %
NFSCF100%
N/A
LBEV - NFSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIST - NFSCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOC - NFSCF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
HUDAU - NFSCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUDA - NFSCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SKGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SKGR has been loosely correlated with GDSTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SKGR jumps, then GDSTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKGR
1D Price
Change %
SKGR100%
N/A
GDSTU - SKGR
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLMJ - SKGR
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MITAU - SKGR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCBF - SKGR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFSCF - SKGR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More