NFSCF vs SOC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFSCF is a Hold and SOC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NFSCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSOC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NFSCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SOC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SOC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SOC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
NFSCF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOC (@Contract Drilling) price change was +7.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
SOC is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Contract Drilling (+0.51% weekly)The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
| NFSCF | SOC | NFSCF / SOC | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 659M | 31% |
| EBITDA | -800.04K | -4.92M | 16% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 6.987 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 24.07 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 43.2K | 268K | 16% |
| Total Debt | 196K | 7.51M | 3% |
| NFSCF | SOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 17% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 7% | 12 days ago 23% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 27% |
NFSCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFSCF has been loosely correlated with LBEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFSCF jumps, then LBEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFSCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFSCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBEV - NFSCF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIST - NFSCF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOC - NFSCF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| HUDAU - NFSCF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HUDA - NFSCF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOC has been loosely correlated with CXAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOC jumps, then CXAI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| CXAI - SOC | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.29% | ||
| DECA - SOC | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLMIU - SOC | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBR - SOC | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| PLMJU - SOC | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||