Ad is loading...
NGDCX vs RGACX
NGDCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$25.36
Change+$0.16 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$68.46
Change+$0.70 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
NGDCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. NGDCX (2.27B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGACX (0.09) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDCX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NGDCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGACX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. NGDCX (-1.91). RGACX (68.49) and NGDCX (65.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDCX | RGACX | NGDCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.726 | -4.903 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 275B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | 0.34 | -559% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.13 | 5.90 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.46 | 68.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.35 | 58.32 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers