Ad is loading...
NGDCX vs RGACX
NGDCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$26.04
Change-$0.50 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$69.13
Change-$1.50 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NGDCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. NGDCX (2.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGACX (0.25) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDCX (15 years) vs RGACX (22 years). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (31.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGACX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. NGDCX (15.84). RGACX (44.83) and NGDCX (44.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDCX | RGACX | NGDCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.220 | 15.333 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.84 | 17.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.88 | -8.22 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.24 | 44.83 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.62 | 54.27 | 29% |