Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs NSAOX
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs NSAOX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.97
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. NSAOX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. NSAOX (1.07B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than NSAOX: NHCCX (4.56) vs NSAOX (4.25). NHCCX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: NHCCX (11 years) vs NSAOX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than NSAOX (0.81). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX (3000) and NSAOX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. NHCCX (-4.73). NSAOX return over 5 years is better than : 3.21 vs. NHCCX (2.36).
| NHCCX | NSAOX | NHCCX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.650 | -0.988 | 370% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 1.07B | 1,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.73 | 0.29 | -1,612% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.68 | 9.38 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.36 | 3.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.20 | 22.28 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers