Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs NSAOX
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs NSAOX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.66
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. NSAOX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. NSAOX (1.06B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than NSAOX: NHCCX (4.49) vs NSAOX (4.22). NHCCX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: NHCCX (11 years) vs NSAOX (10 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than NSAOX (0.81). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. NHCCX (28.00). NHCCX (3000) and NSAOX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. NHCCX (-2.31). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.81 vs. NSAOX (5.34).
| NHCCX | NSAOX | NHCCX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.685 | -1.441 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 1.06B | 1,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 4.22 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.31 | 1.38 | -168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 7.92 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.81 | 5.34 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.02 | 21.72 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement