Ad is loading...
NHCCX vs NSAOX
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs NSAOX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
NHCCX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. NSAOX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. NSAOX (1.1B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than NSAOX: NHCCX (4.39) vs NSAOX (4.15). NHCCX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: NHCCX (11 years) vs NSAOX (10 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than NSAOX (0.81). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. NHCCX (28.00). NHCCX (3000) and NSAOX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.97 vs. NHCCX (-0.39). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. NSAOX (5.64).
| NHCCX | NSAOX | NHCCX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.81 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.842 | -2.198 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 1.1B | 1,324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 4.15 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.39 | 1.97 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.47 | 2.62 | -94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | 5.64 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.62 | 18.88 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers