Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PTFYX
NHCCX vs PTFYX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PTFYX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.90
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Y
Price$11.18
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.14M
NHCCX vs PTFYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PTFYX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PTFYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. PTFYX (641M). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PTFYX: NHCCX (4.56) vs PTFYX (4.25). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PTFYX: NHCCX (11 years) vs PTFYX (17 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than PTFYX (0.71). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PTFYX (25.00). PTFYX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: PTFYX (0) vs NHCCX (3000). PTFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.16 vs. NHCCX (-3.80). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.42 vs. PTFYX (-6.38).
| NHCCX | PTFYX | NHCCX / PTFYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.71 | 410% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.71 | 410% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.857 | -3.491 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 641M | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.56 | 4.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.80 | -3.16 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.95 | -4.08 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.42 | -6.38 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.29 | -6.02 | -221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement