Ad is loading...
NHCCX vs PYMAX
NHCCX vs PYMAX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PYMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.99
Change+$0.08 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
PIMCO High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$8.21
Change+$0.03 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.55B
NHCCX vs PYMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PYMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PYMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. PYMAX (5.55B). NHCCX (4.39) and PYMAX (4.21) have matching dividends . NHCCX was incepted earlier than PYMAX: NHCCX (11 years) vs PYMAX (19 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than PYMAX (0.86). PYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NHCCX (28.00). PYMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: PYMAX (1000) vs NHCCX (3000). PYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.76 vs. NHCCX (-1.31). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.80 vs. PYMAX (7.95).
| NHCCX | PYMAX | NHCCX / PYMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.86 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.86 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.733 | -2.476 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 5.55B | 261% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 4.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.31 | 1.76 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.76 | 3.36 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.80 | 7.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.72 | 28.27 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers