Ad is loading...
NHCCX vs RWMNX
NHCCX vs RWMNX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs RWMNX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.08
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
Redwood Managed Municipal Income N
Price$14.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets121.91M
NHCCX vs RWMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. RWMNX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and RWMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. RWMNX (122M). NHCCX pays higher dividends than RWMNX: NHCCX (4.49) vs RWMNX (1.76). NHCCX was incepted earlier than RWMNX: NHCCX (11 years) vs RWMNX (8 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than RWMNX (2.75). RWMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. NHCCX (28.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMNX: NHCCX (3000) vs RWMNX (10000). RWMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. NHCCX (-1.94). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.34 vs. RWMNX (3.83).
| NHCCX | RWMNX | NHCCX / RWMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 2.56 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 2.75 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.929 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 10000 | 30% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 122M | 11,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.49 | 1.76 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 2.88 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.94 | 0.19 | 2,074% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.34 | 3.83 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...