Ad is loading...
NHMAX vs NSAOX
NHMAX vs NSAOX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs NSAOX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond A
Price$14.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
Nuveen Strategic Municipal Opps A
Price$9.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
NHMAX vs NSAOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. NSAOX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and NSAOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. NSAOX (1.06B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than NSAOX: NHMAX (5.33) vs NSAOX (4.22). NHMAX was incepted earlier than NSAOX: NHMAX (26 years) vs NSAOX (10 years). NHMAX (2.11) is less costly to investors than NSAOX (0.81). NSAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. NHMAX (28.00). NHMAX initial investment is less costly to investors than NSAOX (3%) vs NSAOX (3%). NHMAX (3000) and NSAOX (3000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NSAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. NHMAX (0.00). NHMAX return over 5 years is better than : 14.23 vs. NSAOX (7.37).
| NHMAX | NSAOX | NHMAX / NSAOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.81 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.81 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.450 | -1.035 | 237% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 140% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 3000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 1.06B | 1,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.33 | 4.22 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | 1.80 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.81 | 8.26 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.23 | 7.37 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.50 | 21.98 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers