Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMFX vs PIMAX
NHMFX vs PIMAX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PIMAX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.90
Change-$0.06 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
Victory Pioneer High Income Mun A
Price$5.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets987.65M
NHMFX vs PIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PIMAX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. PIMAX (988M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PIMAX: NHMFX (5.67) vs PIMAX (5.07). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PIMAX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PIMAX (19 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PIMAX (0.87). PIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NHMFX (18.00). PIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PIMAX (1000) vs NHMFX (1000000). PIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. NHMFX (-4.21). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 6.70 vs. PIMAX (2.26).
| NHMFX | PIMAX | NHMFX / PIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.82 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.87 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.425 | -2.660 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 988M | 1,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 5.07 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.21 | 0.93 | -451% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.92 | 2.95 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.70 | 2.26 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.07 | - |