Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMFX vs PTCCX
NHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PTCCX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$13.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets641.14M
NHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PTCCX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. PTCCX (641M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: NHMFX (5.67) vs PTCCX (3.22). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PTCCX (26 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PTCCX (1.71). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PTCCX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.84 vs. PTCCX (-3.25). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 8.95 vs. PTCCX (-6.85).
| NHMFX | PTCCX | NHMFX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.71 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.71 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.549 | -3.582 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 641M | 2,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 3.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.84 | -3.25 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.07 | -4.17 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.95 | -6.85 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers