Ad is loading...
NHMFX vs PTCCX
NHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison
Open Charts NHMFX vs PTCCX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.15
Change-$0.03 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield C
Price$11.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets656.74M
NHMFX vs PTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMFX vs. PTCCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMFX is a Hold and PTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. PTCCX (657M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than PTCCX: NHMFX (5.58) vs PTCCX (3.16). NHMFX was incepted earlier than PTCCX: NHMFX (9 years) vs PTCCX (26 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PTCCX (1.71). NHMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. PTCCX (25.00). PTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: PTCCX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). NHMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.24 vs. PTCCX (-2.17). NHMFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.56 vs. PTCCX (-2.45).
| NHMFX | PTCCX | NHMFX / PTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.71 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.71 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.434 | -3.009 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 657M | 2,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.58 | 3.16 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.24 | -2.17 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.50 | -0.10 | -7,548% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.56 | -2.45 | -636% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -6.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...