Ad is loading...
NIC
Price
$111.84
Change
+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
64 days until earnings call
SBFG
Price
$20.31
Change
+$0.37 (+1.86%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NIC vs SBFG

Header iconNIC vs SBFG Comparison
Open Charts NIC vs SBFGBanner chart's image
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$111.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.04%)
Volume$33.07K
CapitalizationN/A
SB Financial Group
Price$20.31
Change+$0.37 (+1.86%)
Volume$27.24K
CapitalizationN/A
NIC vs SBFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIC vs. SBFG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIC is a Sell and SBFG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NIC: $111.84 vs. SBFG: $20.31)
Brand notoriety: NIC and SBFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIC: 67% vs. SBFG: 240%
Market capitalization -- NIC: $1.25B vs. SBFG: $95.02M
NIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.25B. SBFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $95.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFG is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.77% price change this week, while SBFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

SBFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($1.25B) has a higher market cap than SBFG($95M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than SBFG: NIC (20.55) vs SBFG (8.00). NIC YTD gains are higher at: 40.275 vs. SBFG (37.097). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. SBFG (19M). SBFG has less debt than NIC: SBFG (103M) vs NIC (167M). NIC has higher revenues than SBFG: NIC (278M) vs SBFG (57M).
NICSBFGNIC / SBFG
Capitalization1.25B95M1,311%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.27537.097109%
P/E Ratio20.558.00257%
Revenue278M57M488%
Total Cash130M19M684%
Total Debt167M103M162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIC vs SBFG: Fundamental Ratings
NIC
SBFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3240
SMR RATING
1..100
1751
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9528

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFG's Valuation (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBFG (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBFG (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NIC (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIC (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIEX17.80-0.15
-0.84%
Hartford Schroders International Stk I
CSMIX44.78-0.40
-0.89%
Columbia Small Cap Value I A
WSCGX39.06-0.83
-2.08%
Allspring Small Company Growth Inst
MGFRX10.02-0.22
-2.15%
MassMutual Global R4
HCPSX81.98-2.37
-2.81%
ProFunds UltraSector Health Care Svc

SBFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBFG and FUNC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBFG and FUNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFG
1D Price
Change %
SBFG100%
+1.86%
FUNC - SBFG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
FFNW - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
PLBC - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
EBC - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
NIC - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More