Ad is loading...
NIOAX vs OSMAX
NIOAX vs OSMAX Comparison
Open Charts NIOAX vs OSMAX
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
Price$13.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com A
Price$39.76
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
NIOAX vs OSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIOAX vs. OSMAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOAX is a StrongBuy and OSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMAX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. NIOAX (2.65M). OSMAX pays higher dividends than NIOAX: OSMAX (1.33) vs NIOAX (1.09). NIOAX was incepted earlier than OSMAX: NIOAX (8 years) vs OSMAX (27 years). NIOAX (10.13) is less costly to investors than OSMAX (1.37). NIOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. OSMAX (21.00). NIOAX (6%) and OSMAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NIOAX (1000) and OSMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NIOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.01 vs. OSMAX (-3.79). NIOAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. OSMAX (-6.38).
| NIOAX | OSMAX | NIOAX / OSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.37 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.13 | 1.37 | 739% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.946 | 9.203 | 65% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65M | 3.49B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.33 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.01 | -3.79 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | 0.63 | 1,659% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | -6.38 | -441% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...