Ad is loading...
NIOAX vs OSMAX
NIOAX vs OSMAX Comparison
Open Charts NIOAX vs OSMAX
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
Price$12.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com A
Price$37.81
Change+$0.24 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
NIOAX vs OSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIOAX vs. OSMAX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOAX is a StrongBuy and OSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMAX has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. NIOAX (6.09M). OSMAX pays higher dividends than NIOAX: OSMAX (1.39) vs NIOAX (1.15). NIOAX was incepted earlier than OSMAX: NIOAX (8 years) vs OSMAX (27 years). NIOAX (10.13) is less costly to investors than OSMAX (1.37). NIOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. OSMAX (21.00). NIOAX (6%) and OSMAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. NIOAX (1000) and OSMAX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NIOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. OSMAX (-7.31). NIOAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.41 vs. OSMAX (-4.21).
| NIOAX | OSMAX | NIOAX / OSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.37 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.13 | 1.37 | 739% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.849 | 2.903 | -29% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.09M | 3.37B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.39 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | -7.31 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.27 | -15.46 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.41 | -4.21 | -651% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers