Ad is loading...
NIOAX vs OSMCX
NIOAX vs OSMCX Comparison
Open Charts NIOAX vs OSMCX
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
Price$13.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com C
Price$33.51
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.49B
NIOAX vs OSMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIOAX vs. OSMCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOAX is a StrongBuy and OSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMCX has more cash in the bank: 3.49B vs. NIOAX (2.65M). NIOAX pays higher dividends than OSMCX: NIOAX (1.09) vs OSMCX (0.51). NIOAX was incepted earlier than OSMCX: NIOAX (8 years) vs OSMCX (27 years). NIOAX (10.13) is less costly to investors than OSMCX (2.13). NIOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. OSMCX (21.00). NIOAX (1000) and OSMCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NIOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.01 vs. OSMCX (-5.85). NIOAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.14 vs. OSMCX (-13.60).
| NIOAX | OSMCX | NIOAX / OSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 2.13 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.13 | 2.13 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.946 | 8.914 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65M | 3.49B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.51 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.01 | -5.85 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.53 | -3.34 | -315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.14 | -13.60 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers