Ad is loading...
NIOAX vs OSMCX
NIOAX vs OSMCX Comparison
Open Charts NIOAX vs OSMCX
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
Price$12.94
Change+$0.10 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.09M
Invesco International Small-Mid Com C
Price$31.88
Change+$0.20 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
NIOAX vs OSMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIOAX vs. OSMCX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOAX is a StrongBuy and OSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSMCX has more cash in the bank: 3.37B vs. NIOAX (6.09M). NIOAX pays higher dividends than OSMCX: NIOAX (1.15) vs OSMCX (0.53). NIOAX was incepted earlier than OSMCX: NIOAX (8 years) vs OSMCX (27 years). NIOAX (10.13) is less costly to investors than OSMCX (2.13). NIOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. OSMCX (21.00). NIOAX (1000) and OSMCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NIOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.40 vs. OSMCX (-9.28). NIOAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.41 vs. OSMCX (-11.60).
| NIOAX | OSMCX | NIOAX / OSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 2.13 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.13 | 2.13 | 476% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.849 | 2.690 | -32% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.09M | 3.37B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 0.53 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.40 | -9.28 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.27 | -18.79 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.41 | -11.60 | -236% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers