It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NKLA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NKLA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
NKLA (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -21.38% price change this week, while SHYF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.26%.
NKLA is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
SHYF is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
NKLA | SHYF | NKLA / SHYF | |
Capitalization | 1.39B | 426M | 326% |
EBITDA | -736.28M | 24.2M | -3,042% |
Gain YTD | -95.237 | 2.340 | -4,070% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 64.21 | - |
Revenue | 35.8M | 872M | 4% |
Total Cash | 465M | 9.96M | 4,670% |
Total Debt | 285M | 132M | 216% |
NKLA | SHYF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SHYF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKLA (93). This means that SHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKLA’s over the last 12 months.
SHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NKLA (100). This means that SHYF’s stock grew similarly to NKLA’s over the last 12 months.
SHYF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as NKLA (98). This means that SHYF’s stock grew similarly to NKLA’s over the last 12 months.
SHYF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKLA (98). This means that SHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKLA’s over the last 12 months.
SHYF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NKLA (97). This means that SHYF’s stock grew significantly faster than NKLA’s over the last 12 months.
NKLA | SHYF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 7 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 3 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 8 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 14 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 3 days ago82% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PHSZX | 50.65 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Z | |||
PRJBX | 46.63 | N/A | N/A |
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R2 | |||
CSCAX | 29.52 | -0.18 | -0.61% |
Cove Street Capital Small Cap Val Instl | |||
VSFAX | 25.46 | -0.36 | -1.39% |
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value A | |||
GLVAX | 78.36 | -2.64 | -3.26% |
Invesco Global Focus A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHYF has been loosely correlated with OSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHYF jumps, then OSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SHYF | 100% | -1.83% | ||
OSK - SHYF | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
ALG - SHYF | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
CMCO - SHYF | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
TEX - SHYF | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
CAT - SHYF | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
More |