NKOSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
NMEX
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

NKOSF vs NMEX

Header iconNKOSF vs NMEX Comparison
Open Charts NKOSF vs NMEXBanner chart's image
Labrador Gold
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$73K
CapitalizationN/A
Northern Minerals & Exploration
Price$0.18
Change+$0.02 (+12.50%)
Volume$555
CapitalizationN/A
NKOSF vs NMEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NKOSF vs. NMEX commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NKOSF is a Hold and NMEX is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (NKOSF: $0.04 vs. NMEX: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: NKOSF and NMEX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NKOSF: 74% vs. NMEX: 10%
Market capitalization -- NKOSF: $25.01M vs. NMEX: $5.86M
NKOSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.01M. NMEX’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NKOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMEX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NKOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMEX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMEX is a better buy in the long-term than NKOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NKOSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMEX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NKOSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NMEX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEX is a better buy in the short-term than NKOSF.

Price Growth

NKOSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.77% price change this week, while NMEX (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.21% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NKOSF($25M) has a higher market cap than NMEX($5.86M). NMEX YTD gains are higher at: 176.923 vs. NKOSF (-64.471). NMEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.79K vs. NKOSF (-1.22M). NKOSF has more cash in the bank: 15.7M vs. NMEX (6.29K). NKOSF (0) and NMEX (0) have equivalent revenues.
NKOSFNMEXNKOSF / NMEX
Capitalization25M5.86M427%
EBITDA-1.22M-150.79K812%
Gain YTD-64.471176.923-36%
P/E RatioN/A3333.33-
Revenue00-
Total Cash15.7M6.29K249,682%
Total DebtN/A79K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NKOSF vs NMEX: Fundamental Ratings
NKOSF
NMEX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
512
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
8998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10084
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NKOSF's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (100). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NKOSF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew somewhat faster than NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (98). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (65). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NKOSFNMEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOTO43.72-0.02
-0.05%
SmartETFs Smart Trans & Tch ETF
USEP35.55-0.04
-0.12%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF-Sep
FLHY23.96-0.03
-0.13%
Franklin High Yield Corporate ETF
LQDI25.98-0.08
-0.32%
iShares Inflation Hedged Corp Bd ETF
BBUS109.46-0.50
-0.45%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity ETF

NKOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKOSF and SSVRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKOSF and SSVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKOSF
1D Price
Change %
NKOSF100%
-6.04%
SSVRF - NKOSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
EQX - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
MTA - NKOSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
DYNR - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
WPM - NKOSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More

NMEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEX and MWSNF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEX and MWSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEX
1D Price
Change %
NMEX100%
+12.50%
MWSNF - NMEX
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
NKOSF - NMEX
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.04%
NSGCF - NMEX
-0%
Poorly correlated
-9.59%
MXTLF - NMEX
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGLD - NMEX
-2%
Poorly correlated
+11.27%
More