Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$33.82
Change+$0.11 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834.92M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$80.31
Change+$0.41 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.6B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NLCCX (835M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. NLCCX (4.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.61 vs. NLCCX (-13.43).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.918 | 11.557 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 9.80 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.69 | 57.37 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.43 | 42.61 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.73 | 77.97 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement