Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAEX
NLCCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAEX
NLCCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NLCCX (768M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAEX (0.21) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAEX (32.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAEX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. NLCCX (-3.59). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 18.86 vs. NLCCX (-27.47).
| NLCCX | RGAEX | NLCCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.265 | 8.698 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | 12.00 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | 48.29 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.47 | 18.86 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.46 | 117.44 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement