Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAEX
NLCCX vs RGAEX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAEX
NLCCX vs RGAEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAEX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAEX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NLCCX (749M). RGAEX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAEX (0.21) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAEX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGAEX (24 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAEX (0.63). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAEX (32.00). RGAEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAEX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. NLCCX (-12.58). RGAEX return over 5 years is better than : 11.38 vs. NLCCX (-33.88).
| NLCCX | RGAEX | NLCCX / RGAEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.63 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.858 | 4.651 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.58 | 0.23 | -5,453% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.18 | 36.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.88 | 11.38 | -298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.02 | 97.94 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers