NLOP
Price
$33.12
Change
+$0.21 (+0.64%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
345.08M
UHT
Price
$40.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
489.92M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLOP vs UHT

Header iconNLOP vs UHT Comparison
Open Charts NLOP vs UHTBanner chart's image
Net Lease Office Properties
Price$33.12
Change+$0.21 (+0.64%)
Volume$123.28K
Capitalization345.08M
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
Price$40.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.58K
Capitalization489.92M
NLOP vs UHT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLOP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLOP vs. UHT commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLOP is a StrongBuy and UHT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (NLOP: $33.12 vs. UHT: $40.11)
Brand notoriety: NLOP and UHT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLOP: 154% vs. UHT: 5%
Market capitalization -- NLOP: $345.08M vs. UHT: $489.92M
NLOP [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $345.08M. UHT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $489.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLOP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUHT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NLOP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NLOP is a better buy in the long-term than UHT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLOP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLOP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UHT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UHT is a better buy in the short-term than NLOP.

Price Growth

NLOP (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while UHT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

NLOP is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

UHT is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.58% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UHT($490M) has a higher market cap than NLOP($345M). UHT YTD gains are higher at: 11.765 vs. NLOP (6.120). UHT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 65.2M vs. NLOP (-7.29M). NLOP has more cash in the bank: 16.3M vs. UHT (8.21M). UHT has less debt than NLOP: UHT (370M) vs NLOP (542M). NLOP has higher revenues than UHT: NLOP (175M) vs UHT (95.6M).
NLOPUHTNLOP / UHT
Capitalization345M490M70%
EBITDA-7.29M65.2M-11%
Gain YTD6.12011.76552%
P/E RatioN/A31.93-
Revenue175M95.6M183%
Total Cash16.3M8.21M198%
Total Debt542M370M146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UHT: Fundamental Ratings
UHT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLOPUHT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLOP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEGRX29.170.27
+0.93%
Templeton Growth R
NIEYX18.240.16
+0.88%
BNY Mellon International Equity Y
FLUIX28.320.15
+0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val I
FTANX12.330.01
+0.08%
Fidelity Asset Manager 30%
GSACX19.61-0.14
-0.71%
Goldman Sachs China Equity C

NLOP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLOP has been loosely correlated with KRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLOP jumps, then KRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLOP
1D Price
Change %
NLOP100%
+0.64%
KRC - NLOP
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
DEI - NLOP
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
NXRT - NLOP
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
SLG - NLOP
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
LXP - NLOP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More