Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs SPEDX
NLSAX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.22B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$20.05
Change+$0.14 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.84M
NLSAX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. SPEDX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.22B vs. SPEDX (197M). NLSAX (0.00) and SPEDX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSAX (13 years) vs SPEDX (15 years). SPEDX (2.07) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than SPEDX (5%) vs SPEDX (5%). NLSAX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. NLSAX (6.12). SPEDX return over 5 years is better than : 34.89 vs. NLSAX (29.81).
| NLSAX | SPEDX | NLSAX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.07 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.07 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.488 | -4.691 | -10% |
| Front Load | 6% | 5% | 110% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.22B | 197M | 3,666% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.12 | 10.37 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 19.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.81 | 34.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 57.02 | 69% |