Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs VLSCX
NLSAX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$16.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.21M
NLSAX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. VLSCX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. VLSCX (11.2M). NLSAX (0.00) and VLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSAX (14 years) vs VLSCX (7 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSCX: NLSAX (1000) vs VLSCX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. VLSCX (0.18). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.66 vs. VLSCX (8.88).
| NLSAX | VLSCX | NLSAX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 3.03 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 3.21 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.713 | 2.413 | 195% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.52B | 11.2M | 67,179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.02 | 0.18 | 5,516% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.71 | 8.74 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 8.88 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement