Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs VLSCX
NLSAX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.55
Change+$0.18 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.15 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.07M
NLSAX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. VLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. VLSCX (53.1M). NLSAX (0.00) and VLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSAX (13 years) vs VLSCX (6 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSCX: NLSAX (1000) vs VLSCX (2500). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. VLSCX (-7.89). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.55 vs. VLSCX (16.56).
| NLSAX | VLSCX | NLSAX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 3.03 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 3.21 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.488 | -6.807 | 7% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.13B | 53.1M | 13,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | -7.89 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.46 | -7.89 | -133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.55 | 16.56 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...