Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs VLSRX
NLSAX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$17.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.09M
NLSAX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. VLSRX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.45B vs. VLSRX (16.1M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: VLSRX (0.44) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSAX (14 years) vs VLSRX (7 years). VLSRX (2.05) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSAX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. VLSRX (-0.69). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.76 vs. VLSRX (15.65).
| NLSAX | VLSRX | NLSAX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.96 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.05 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.117 | 2.834 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 16.1M | 46,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | -0.69 | -1,119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 11.88 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.76 | 15.65 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement