Ad is loading...
NLSAX vs VLSRX
NLSAX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$18.24
Change-$0.24 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$16.35
Change-$0.42 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.92M
NLSAX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. VLSRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. VLSRX (55.9M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: VLSRX (0.46) vs NLSAX (0.00). NLSAX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSAX (13 years) vs VLSRX (6 years). VLSRX (2.05) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSAX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. VLSRX (-8.07). VLSRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. NLSAX (36.03).
| NLSAX | VLSRX | NLSAX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.96 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.05 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.108 | -3.008 | -4% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 55.9M | 12,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | -8.07 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | -5.11 | -156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 43.71 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers