Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs QLENX
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs QLENX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. QLENX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. QLENX (4.96B). QLENX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: QLENX (6.20) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than QLENX: NLSCX (13 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: NLSCX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.94 vs. NLSCX (6.36). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 181.35 vs. NLSCX (22.58).
| NLSCX | QLENX | NLSCX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.58 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.59 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.148 | 15.459 | 14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 4.96B | 148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 6.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 25.94 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.61 | 77.64 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.58 | 181.35 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.27 | 148.41 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement