Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs QLENX
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs QLENX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
NLSCX vs QLENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. QLENX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. QLENX (5.17B). QLENX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: QLENX (6.07) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than QLENX: NLSCX (14 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: NLSCX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.30 vs. NLSCX (9.30). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 178.75 vs. NLSCX (21.84).
| NLSCX | QLENX | NLSCX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.58 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 5.59 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.353 | 15.394 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.52B | 5.17B | 145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 6.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 25.30 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.02 | 92.59 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.84 | 178.75 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.60 | 141.28 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers