Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.46
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.52B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$21.91
Change+$0.14 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.28M
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.52B vs. SPEDX (211M). NLSCX (0.00) and SPEDX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (14 years) vs SPEDX (16 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SPEDX (2.07). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.88 vs. NLSCX (9.30). SPEDX return over 5 years is better than : 29.03 vs. NLSCX (21.84).
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.353 | 4.883 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.52B | 211M | 3,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 18.88 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.02 | 38.76 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.84 | 29.03 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.60 | 68.67 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement