Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.18
Change+$0.17 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$20.75
Change+$0.24 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.8M
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. SPEDX (201M). NLSCX (0.00) and SPEDX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (13 years) vs SPEDX (16 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SPEDX (2.07). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. NLSCX (5.75). SPEDX return over 5 years is better than : 30.22 vs. NLSCX (25.93).
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.809 | -1.819 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.33B | 201M | 3,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 11.47 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.85 | 29.56 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.93 | 30.22 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.11 | 59.86 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers