Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.07B
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$19.78
Change-$0.10 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.2M
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.07B vs. SPEDX (191M). NLSCX (0.00) and SPEDX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (13 years) vs SPEDX (15 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than SPEDX (2.07). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.02 vs. NLSCX (3.64). SPEDX return over 5 years is better than : 35.42 vs. NLSCX (22.03).
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.752 | -4.835 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.07B | 191M | 3,702% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | 10.02 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | 15.25 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.03 | 35.42 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.52 | 56.17 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...