Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs SPEDX
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs SPEDX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Alger Dynamic Opportunities A
Price$19.76
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs SPEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NLSCX vs. SPEDX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and SPEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. SPEDX (206M). NLSCX pays higher dividends than SPEDX: NLSCX (0.03) vs SPEDX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than SPEDX: NLSCX (13 years) vs SPEDX (15 years). SPEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 350.56 vs. NLSCX (54.00). NLSCX (1000) and SPEDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SPEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.94 vs. NLSCX (6.76). SPEDX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. NLSCX (18.81).
| NLSCX | SPEDX | NLSCX / SPEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.966 | 14.959 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.17B | 206M | 3,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 23.94 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.22 | -11.55 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.81 | 35.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.63 | 50.97 | 52% |