Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs VLSIX
NLSCX vs VLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.56
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.08B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity I
Price$16.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.07M
NLSCX vs VLSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.08B vs. VLSIX (53.1M). VLSIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: VLSIX (0.08) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSIX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSIX (6 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than VLSIX (2.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSIX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSIX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSIX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.44 vs. VLSIX (-6.80). VLSIX (23.13) and NLSCX (22.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NLSCX | VLSIX | NLSCX / VLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.03 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.413 | -6.655 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.08B | 53.1M | 13,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | -6.80 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.39 | -3.45 | -214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.71 | 23.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...