Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs VLSRX
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$16.33
Change+$0.16 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.07M
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSRX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. VLSRX (53.1M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: VLSRX (0.46) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSRX (6 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than VLSRX (2.05). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. VLSRX (-6.45). VLSRX (23.87) and NLSCX (23.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NLSCX | VLSRX | NLSCX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.96 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.05 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.735 | -6.478 | 11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.13B | 53.1M | 13,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.28 | -6.45 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.87 | -4.25 | -185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 23.87 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...