Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs VLSRX
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.44
Change-$0.23 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$16.35
Change-$0.42 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.92M
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSRX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. VLSRX (55.9M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: VLSRX (0.46) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSRX (6 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than VLSRX (2.05). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. VLSRX (-8.07). VLSRX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. NLSCX (30.76).
| NLSCX | VLSRX | NLSCX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.96 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.05 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.113 | -3.008 | 4% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 55.9M | 12,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -8.07 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.37 | -5.11 | -105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.76 | 43.71 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers