Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs VLSRX
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$18.36
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NLSCX vs. VLSRX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. VLSRX (62.2M). NLSCX pays higher dividends than VLSRX: NLSCX (0.03) vs VLSRX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSCX (13 years) vs VLSRX (6 years). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. VLSRX (13.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). VLSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. NLSCX (8.18). VLSRX return over 5 years is better than : 44.23 vs. NLSCX (19.49).
| NLSCX | VLSRX | NLSCX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.567 | 5.396 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.17B | 62.2M | 11,534% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 9.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | -2.75 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.49 | 44.23 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.67 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers