Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs VLSRX
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs VLSRX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.19
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.37B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity R6
Price$17.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.68M
NLSCX vs VLSRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. VLSRX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and VLSRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.37B vs. VLSRX (40.7M). VLSRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: VLSRX (0.44) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than VLSRX: NLSCX (14 years) vs VLSRX (7 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than VLSRX (2.05). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSRX (31.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLSRX: NLSCX (1000) vs VLSRX (2500000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. VLSRX (-0.19). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.87 vs. VLSRX (19.94).
| NLSCX | VLSRX | NLSCX / VLSRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.96 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.05 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.600 | 2.776 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.37B | 40.7M | 18,113% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | -0.19 | -3,396% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.79 | 13.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.87 | 19.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement