Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.44
Change-$0.23 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.80
Change-$0.51 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets419.34M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. WPOPX (419M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WPOPX (2.25). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.76 vs. WPOPX (3.62).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.113 | 0.377 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 419M | 1,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 2.25 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.37 | -10.45 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.76 | 3.62 | 850% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.14 | -23.64 | -123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...