Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.99
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.28B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.97
Change+$0.22 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.12M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.28B vs. WPOPX (399M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. WPOPX (1.61). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.86 vs. WPOPX (-10.23).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.187 | -3.846 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.28B | 399M | 1,824% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 1.61 | 413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.36 | -6.62 | -156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.86 | -10.23 | -253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.12 | -25.96 | -120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers