Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.28
Change+$0.09 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.50
Change+$0.05 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.87M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. WPOPX (415M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.25 vs. WPOPX (5.02). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.14 vs. WPOPX (-3.26).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.826 | 1.433 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 415M | 1,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.25 | 5.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.13 | 5.28 | 286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.14 | -3.26 | -709% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.41 | -12.62 | -273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers