Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs WPOPX
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.56B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.4M
NLSCX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. WPOPX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.56B vs. WPOPX (402M). WPOPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: WPOPX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSCX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPOPX: NLSCX (1000) vs WPOPX (1000000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.56 vs. WPOPX (-0.28). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. WPOPX (-13.82).
| NLSCX | WPOPX | NLSCX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 1.19 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.975 | -1.131 | -440% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.56B | 402M | 1,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | -0.28 | -3,371% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.96 | -2.92 | -444% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.45 | -13.82 | -155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.75 | -14.99 | -258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers