Ad is loading...
NLSIX vs QQMNX
NLSIX vs QQMNX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs QQMNX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral IS
Price$21.30
Change-$0.11 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
NLSIX vs QQMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. QQMNX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and QQMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. QQMNX (1.45B). QQMNX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: QQMNX (1.77) vs NLSIX (0.02). NLSIX was incepted earlier than QQMNX: NLSIX (13 years) vs QQMNX (17 years). QQMNX (1.87) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). QQMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). NLSIX (1000000) and QQMNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QQMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.95 vs. NLSIX (7.12). QQMNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.01 vs. NLSIX (32.86).
| NLSIX | QQMNX | NLSIX / QQMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.86 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.87 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.187 | 5.081 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.33B | 1.45B | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.77 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 12.95 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 16.82 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.86 | 40.01 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.54 | 26.69 | 178% |