Ad is loading...
NLSIX vs VLSCX
NLSIX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.54
Change-$0.24 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$15.63
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.12M
NLSIX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. VLSCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. VLSCX (56.1M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than VLSCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs VLSCX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSIX (13 years) vs VLSCX (6 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). VLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: VLSCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.53 vs. VLSCX (-9.15). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 38.63 vs. VLSCX (35.84).
| NLSIX | VLSCX | NLSIX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 3.03 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 3.21 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.160 | -2.908 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 56.1M | 12,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | -9.15 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.73 | -8.19 | -119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.63 | 35.84 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...