Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs VLSCX
NLSIX vs VLSCX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs VLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.42B
Virtus KAR Long/Short Equity C
Price$16.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.3M
NLSIX vs VLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. VLSCX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and VLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.42B vs. VLSCX (17.3M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than VLSCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs VLSCX (0.00). NLSIX was incepted earlier than VLSCX: NLSIX (14 years) vs VLSCX (7 years). VLSCX (3.21) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. VLSCX (31.00). VLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: VLSCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. VLSCX (-1.61). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.45 vs. VLSCX (9.98).
| NLSIX | VLSCX | NLSIX / VLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 3.03 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 3.21 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.840 | 2.290 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.42B | 17.3M | 42,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | -1.61 | -502% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.95 | 10.72 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.45 | 9.98 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement