Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs WPOPX
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.48
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.41
Change+$0.17 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.26M
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. WPOPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and WPOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. WPOPX (412M). WPOPX (0.02) and NLSIX (0.02) have matching dividends . NLSIX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSIX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSIX (1000000) and WPOPX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. WPOPX (3.46). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. WPOPX (-14.81).
| NLSIX | WPOPX | NLSIX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.627 | -0.151 | -2,404% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 412M | 1,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 3.46 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.99 | -4.43 | -361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.69 | -14.81 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | -22.62 | -222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement