Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSIX vs WPOPX
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.56B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$13.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.4M
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. WPOPX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.56B vs. WPOPX (402M). WPOPX (0.02) and NLSIX (0.02) have matching dividends . NLSIX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSIX (14 years) vs WPOPX (20 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (25.00). NLSIX (1000000) and WPOPX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. WPOPX (-0.28). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.85 vs. WPOPX (-13.82).
| NLSIX | WPOPX | NLSIX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.653 | -1.131 | -500% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.56B | 402M | 1,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | -0.28 | -3,794% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.09 | -2.92 | -585% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | -13.82 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.61 | -14.99 | -371% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers