Ad is loading...
NLSIX vs WPOPX
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison
Open Charts NLSIX vs WPOPX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$18.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.22B
Weitz Partners III Opportunity Instl
Price$12.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets395.43M
NLSIX vs WPOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSIX vs. WPOPX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSIX is a Buy and WPOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.22B vs. WPOPX (395M). NLSIX (0.02) and WPOPX (0.02) have matching dividends . NLSIX was incepted earlier than WPOPX: NLSIX (13 years) vs WPOPX (19 years). NLSIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than WPOPX (1.19). NLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. WPOPX (19.00). NLSIX (1000000) and WPOPX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. WPOPX (0.58). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 32.75 vs. WPOPX (-9.81).
| NLSIX | WPOPX | NLSIX / WPOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.19 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.853 | -4.751 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.22B | 395M | 1,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 0.58 | 1,176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.16 | -7.70 | -184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.75 | -9.81 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.96 | -27.12 | -166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers