Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMAAX vs SQMCX
NMAAX vs SQMCX Comparison
Open Charts NMAAX vs SQMCX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.87
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.36M
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free C
Price$12.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.41M
NMAAX vs SQMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMAAX vs. SQMCX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMAAX is a Hold and SQMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. SQMCX (190M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than SQMCX: NMAAX (3.42) vs SQMCX (2.06). NMAAX was incepted earlier than SQMCX: NMAAX (31 years) vs SQMCX (24 years). SQMCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.80). SQMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NMAAX (14.00). SQMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: SQMCX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). NMAAX (-2.26) and SQMCX (-2.29) have marching annual gain over last year. NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.70 vs. SQMCX (-6.66).
| NMAAX | SQMCX | NMAAX / SQMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.62 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.77 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.308 | -1.805 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 190M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.06 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.26 | -2.29 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.10 | 1.81 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.70 | -6.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.72 | 4.79 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement