Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMAAX vs VMATX
NMAAX vs VMATX Comparison
Open Charts NMAAX vs VMATX
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets411.36M
Vanguard MA Tax-Exempt I
Price$9.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97B
NMAAX vs VMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMAAX vs. VMATX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMAAX is a Hold and VMATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMATX has more cash in the bank: 2.97B vs. NMAAX (411M). VMATX pays higher dividends than NMAAX: VMATX (3.64) vs NMAAX (3.42). NMAAX was incepted earlier than VMATX: NMAAX (31 years) vs VMATX (27 years). NMAAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than VMATX (0.09). VMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. NMAAX (14.00). NMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMATX: NMAAX (2500) vs VMATX (3000). NMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.15 vs. VMATX (-4.50). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.98 vs. VMATX (-14.24).
| NMAAX | VMATX | NMAAX / VMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.09 | 889% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.09 | 889% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.308 | -3.363 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 2.97B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 3.64 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.15 | -4.50 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.55 | -3.22 | -79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.98 | -14.24 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.51 | -9.12 | -71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers