Ad is loading...
NMBAX vs TAMUX
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs TAMUX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
Transamerica Intermediate Muni A
Price$10.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets977.37M
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. TAMUX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and TAMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. TAMUX (977M). TAMUX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: TAMUX (3.37) vs NMBAX (3.08). NMBAX was incepted earlier than TAMUX: NMBAX (30 years) vs TAMUX (13 years). TAMUX (0.78) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.65). TAMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). TAMUX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). TAMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: TAMUX (1000) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.21 vs. TAMUX (1.02). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.49 vs. TAMUX (1.84).
| NMBAX | TAMUX | NMBAX / TAMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.68 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.118 | -1.312 | 9% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 92% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.58B | 977M | 776% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.08 | 3.37 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.21 | 1.02 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.68 | 6.96 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.49 | 1.84 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.89 | 14.18 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers