Ad is loading...
NMBAX vs TAMUX
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs TAMUX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.69B
Transamerica Intermediate Muni A
Price$10.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. TAMUX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and TAMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.69B vs. TAMUX (1.02B). TAMUX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: TAMUX (3.30) vs NMBAX (3.04). NMBAX was incepted earlier than TAMUX: NMBAX (30 years) vs TAMUX (12 years). TAMUX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.65). TAMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). TAMUX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). TAMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: TAMUX (1000) vs NMBAX (3000). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.66 vs. TAMUX (1.57). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.20 vs. TAMUX (5.10).
| NMBAX | TAMUX | NMBAX / TAMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.66 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.76 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.311 | -0.660 | -47% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 92% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 1000 | 300% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.69B | 1.02B | 751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.30 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.66 | 1.57 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.36 | 1.96 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | 5.10 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.90 | 13.60 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers