Ad is loading...
NMBAX vs THIMX
NMBAX vs THIMX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs THIMX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.8B
Thornburg Intermediate Municipal A
Price$13.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
NMBAX vs THIMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. THIMX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and THIMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 7.8B vs. THIMX (1.03B). THIMX pays higher dividends than NMBAX: THIMX (3.44) vs NMBAX (2.97). NMBAX was incepted earlier than THIMX: NMBAX (30 years) vs THIMX (34 years). THIMX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.65). NMBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. THIMX (19.48). NMBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than THIMX (2%) vs THIMX (2%). NMBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than THIMX: NMBAX (3000) vs THIMX (5000). THIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.74 vs. NMBAX (2.57). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.67 vs. THIMX (1.27).
| NMBAX | THIMX | NMBAX / THIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.72 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.313 | 1.208 | 109% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 5000 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.8B | 1.03B | 756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 3.44 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.57 | 2.74 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.17 | 5.12 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.67 | 1.27 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.77 | 11.15 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers