NMEX
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.05 (+71.43%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
5.86M
NRRSF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.04 (+8.16%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NMEX vs NRRSF

Header iconNMEX vs NRRSF Comparison
Open Charts NMEX vs NRRSFBanner chart's image
Northern Minerals & Exploration
Price$0.12
Change+$0.05 (+71.43%)
Volume$2.43K
Capitalization5.86M
Norsemont Mining
Price$0.53
Change+$0.04 (+8.16%)
Volume$65.53K
Capitalization8.41M
NMEX vs NRRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMEX vs. NRRSF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMEX is a Buy and NRRSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (NMEX: $0.12 vs. NRRSF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: NMEX and NRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMEX: 17% vs. NRRSF: 75%
Market capitalization -- NMEX: $5.86M vs. NRRSF: $8.41M
NMEX [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86M. NRRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMEX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NMEX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRRSF is a better buy in the long-term than NMEX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMEX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRRSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMEX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NRRSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMEX is a better buy in the short-term than NRRSF.

Price Growth

NMEX (@Precious Metals) experienced а +103.40% price change this week, while NRRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +29.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.04% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRRSF($8.41M) has a higher market cap than NMEX($5.86M). NRRSF YTD gains are higher at: 372.673 vs. NMEX (-39.723). NMEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -150.79K vs. NRRSF (-3.7M). NRRSF has more cash in the bank: 51.2K vs. NMEX (6.29K). NMEX has less debt than NRRSF: NMEX (79K) vs NRRSF (1.54M). NMEX (0) and NRRSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NMEXNRRSFNMEX / NRRSF
Capitalization5.86M8.41M70%
EBITDA-150.79K-3.7M4%
Gain YTD-39.723372.673-11%
P/E Ratio3333.33N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.29K51.2K12%
Total Debt79K1.54M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMEX vs NRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
NMEX
NRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRRSF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMEX (100). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as NRRSF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to NRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

NRRSF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (98). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NRRSF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEX (35). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew similarly to NMEX’s over the last 12 months.

NMEX's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NRRSF (100). This means that NMEX’s stock grew similarly to NRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMEXNRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NRRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XGN7.180.18
+2.57%
Exagen
FIZZ46.940.79
+1.71%
National Beverage Corp
ET17.540.10
+0.57%
Energy Transfer LP
BZH23.370.13
+0.56%
Beazer Homes USA
LCTX0.99-0.03
-2.94%
Lineage Cell Therapeutics

NMEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEX and MWSNF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEX and MWSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEX
1D Price
Change %
NMEX100%
N/A
MWSNF - NMEX
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
NKOSF - NMEX
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.55%
NSGCF - NMEX
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
NGLD - NMEX
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
NRRSF - NMEX
-6%
Poorly correlated
+9.90%
More

NRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRRSF and GORIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRRSF and GORIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRRSF
1D Price
Change %
NRRSF100%
+9.90%
GORIF - NRRSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBYSF - NRRSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
CYPMF - NRRSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UGDIF - NRRSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
NSGCF - NRRSF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More