NMFC
Price
$11.98
Change
+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
3 days until earnings call
TRIN
Price
$15.83
Change
-$0.19 (-1.19%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
672.87M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NMFC vs TRIN

Header iconNMFC vs TRIN Comparison
Open Charts NMFC vs TRINBanner chart's image
New Mountain Finance
Price$11.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$247.29K
Capitalization1.34B
Trinity Capital
Price$15.83
Change-$0.19 (-1.19%)
Volume$464.08K
Capitalization672.87M
NMFC vs TRIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NMFC vs. TRIN commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMFC is a Hold and TRIN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NMFC: $11.98 vs. TRIN: $15.83)
Brand notoriety: NMFC and TRIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NMFC: 56% vs. TRIN: 84%
Market capitalization -- NMFC: $1.34B vs. TRIN: $672.87M
NMFC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.34B. TRIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $672.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NMFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than TRIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the short-term than TRIN.

Price Growth

NMFC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.42% price change this week, while TRIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

TRIN is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMFC($1.34B) has a higher market cap than TRIN($673M). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than TRIN: NMFC (10.15) vs TRIN (7.67). TRIN YTD gains are higher at: 9.399 vs. NMFC (6.394). TRIN has less debt than NMFC: TRIN (640M) vs NMFC (1.79B). NMFC has higher revenues than TRIN: NMFC (144M) vs TRIN (125M).
NMFCTRINNMFC / TRIN
Capitalization1.34B673M199%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.3949.39968%
P/E Ratio10.157.67132%
Revenue144M125M115%
Total CashN/A707K-
Total Debt1.79B640M279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
26
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NMFCTRIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCIWX17.25-0.01
-0.06%
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
KNGIX12.10-0.02
-0.17%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Ins
FSTBX20.75-0.17
-0.81%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
MCLOX16.33-0.16
-0.97%
BlackRock Global Allocation Inv C
CDVZX16.84-0.21
-1.23%
Columbia Large Cap Value Inst

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been loosely correlated with BBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then BBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
+0.08%
BBDC - NMFC
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
TSLX - NMFC
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
GBDC - NMFC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
TCPC - NMFC
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ARCC - NMFC
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More

TRIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRIN has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRIN jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRIN
1D Price
Change %
TRIN100%
-1.19%
MAIN - TRIN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
FSK - TRIN
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
PNNT - TRIN
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
PFLT - TRIN
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
NMFC - TRIN
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More