Ad is loading...
NMGCX vs PMBMX
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison
Open Charts NMGCX vs PMBMX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$16.63
Change-$0.65 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
NMGCX vs PMBMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMGCX vs. PMBMX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMGCX is a Hold and PMBMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 29.6B vs. NMGCX (1.89B). NMGCX (0.00) and PMBMX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMGCX was incepted earlier than PMBMX: NMGCX (16 years) vs PMBMX (24 years). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. PMBMX (10.10). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: PMBMX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. NMGCX (2.78). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.77 vs. NMGCX (-1.64).
| NMGCX | PMBMX | NMGCX / PMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.713 | 1.812 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.89B | 29.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 11.86 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.55 | 26.06 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.64 | 31.77 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.09 | 83.18 | 16% |