Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMIAX vs VTSMX
NMIAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts NMIAX vs VTSMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
Price$28.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets487.2M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.57
Change+$0.58 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91T
NMIAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMIAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMIAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.91T vs. NMIAX (487M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than NMIAX: VTSMX (1.12) vs NMIAX (0.73). NMIAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: NMIAX (29 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). NMIAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). NMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). NMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: NMIAX (2000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. NMIAX (-1.32). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 88.36 vs. NMIAX (23.22).
| NMIAX | VTSMX | NMIAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.14 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.14 | 864% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.558 | 5.711 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 487M | 1.91T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.12 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 9.80 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 59.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.22 | 88.36 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 188.76 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement