Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs RWEBX
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.03
Change+$0.10 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.78M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. NMUAX (249M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUAX (16 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUAX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. RWEBX (7.02). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.48 vs. NMUAX (-27.17).
| NMUAX | RWEBX | NMUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 5.319 | 147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 202B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 7.02 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.49 | 29.59 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.17 | 52.48 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.05 | 65.56 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement