Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUAX vs RWEBX
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$11.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.36M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.25B
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. NMUAX (261M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUAX (16 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NMUAX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. RWEBX (8.72). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.49 vs. NMUAX (-29.82).
| NMUAX | RWEBX | NMUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.895 | 6.518 | 136% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 203B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.91 | 8.72 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.44 | 29.74 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.82 | 50.49 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.62 | 66.74 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement