Ad is loading...
NMUAX vs RWEBX
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUAX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp A
Price$10.16
Change+$0.08 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.32M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$62.23
Change+$0.46 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.2B
NMUAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 191B vs. NMUAX (239M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUAX: RWEBX (0.81) vs NMUAX (0.00). NMUAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUAX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUAX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUAX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUAX (1000). NMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. RWEBX (3.13). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.21 vs. NMUAX (-33.91).
| NMUAX | RWEBX | NMUAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.06 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.684 | 1.750 | -39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 191B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.81 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.90 | 3.13 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.09 | 14.82 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.91 | 47.21 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.94 | 58.64 | -58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...