Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.58
Change-$0.17 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.06M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$62.56
Change-$1.03 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.11B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. NMUCX (241M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (0.84) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUCX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. RWEBX (1.37). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.80 vs. NMUCX (-31.96).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.309 | 2.503 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 241M | 193B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | 1.37 | 555% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.84 | 19.52 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.96 | 53.80 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.02 | 55.90 | -75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement