Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.12
Change+$0.18 (+2.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.65M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.92 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.95B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 179B vs. NMUCX (236M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (0.83) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUCX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.17 vs. RWEBX (0.52). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.55 vs. NMUCX (-35.40).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.191 | -2.167 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 179B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 0.52 | 420% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.96 | 7.34 | -381% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.40 | 51.55 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.82 | 49.16 | -93% |