Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.02
Change-$0.38 (-4.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.38M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$59.23
Change-$2.27 (-3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.67B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. NMUCX (236M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (0.83) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUCX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. RWEBX (1.38). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 75.23 vs. NMUCX (-22.12).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.364 | 0.766 | -178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 236M | 188B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 1.38 | 381% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.79 | 6.61 | -435% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.12 | 75.23 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.33 | 55.09 | -77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...