Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.83
Change+$0.07 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.8M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$62.22
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.62B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. NMUCX (240M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUCX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. RWEBX (5.59). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.50 vs. NMUCX (-33.92).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.413 | 2.151 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 188B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 5.59 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.70 | 23.10 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.92 | 49.50 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.03 | 58.33 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement