Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.54
Change-$0.38 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. NMUCX (263M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (1.07) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (10 years). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NMUCX (14.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.90 vs. NMUCX (7.02). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.50 vs. NMUCX (-48.10).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.180 | 14.916 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 194B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 19.90 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -44.96 | 11.13 | -404% |
| Returns for 5 years | -48.10 | 38.50 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.34 | 57.16 | -67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...