Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.60
Change+$0.08 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$61.12
Change+$0.67 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. NMUCX (247M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (1.07) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (10 years). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NMUCX (14.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.36 vs. RWEBX (9.22). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 31.86 vs. NMUCX (-43.16).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.646 | 8.475 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.36 | 9.22 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.36 | 6.63 | -443% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.16 | 31.86 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.06 | 52.84 | -78% |