Ad is loading...
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$9.66
Change-$0.15 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.03M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$63.69
Change-$0.87 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.11B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. NMUCX (246M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (1.07) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (10 years). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NMUCX (14.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. RWEBX (7.35). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.06 vs. NMUCX (-44.77).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.364 | 4.137 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 7.35 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.47 | 16.22 | -151% |
| Returns for 5 years | -44.77 | 35.06 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.38 | 56.92 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...