Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMUCX vs RWEBX
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMUCX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp C
Price$10.23
Change+$0.09 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.59M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.15
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.46B
NMUCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMUCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMUCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 200B vs. NMUCX (247M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMUCX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NMUCX (0.00). NMUCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMUCX (16 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NMUCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMUCX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMUCX: RWEBX (250) vs NMUCX (1000). NMUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. RWEBX (7.02). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.48 vs. NMUCX (-32.67).
| NMUCX | RWEBX | NMUCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.06 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.401 | 5.319 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 200B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.80 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 7.02 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.72 | 29.59 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.67 | 52.48 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.62 | 65.56 | -57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement