Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMULX vs RWEBX
NMULX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMULX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
Price$10.59
Change+$0.09 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.93M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.49
Change+$0.34 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.6B
NMULX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMULX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMULX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. NMULX (238M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMULX: RWEBX (0.80) vs NMULX (0.12). NMULX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMULX (19 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NMULX (0.88). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMULX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMULX: RWEBX (250) vs NMULX (1000000). NMULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. RWEBX (5.28). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.08 vs. NMULX (-33.09).
| NMULX | RWEBX | NMULX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.240 | 5.665 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.80 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 5.28 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.52 | 16.71 | -81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.09 | 46.08 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.45 | 63.82 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement