Ad is loading...
NMULX vs RWEBX
NMULX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NMULX vs RWEBX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
Price$9.60
Change+$0.16 (+1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.59M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$58.73
Change+$1.02 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.84B
NMULX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMULX vs. RWEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMULX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 176B vs. NMULX (220M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NMULX: RWEBX (0.83) vs NMULX (0.13). NMULX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NMULX (18 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NMULX (0.88). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NMULX (25.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMULX: RWEBX (250) vs NMULX (1000000). NMULX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.41 vs. RWEBX (-2.39). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.43 vs. NMULX (-31.32).
| NMULX | RWEBX | NMULX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.082 | -3.772 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 220M | 176B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.83 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.41 | -2.39 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.53 | 3.51 | -785% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.32 | 50.43 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.73 | 47.46 | -84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...