Investors evaluating dividend-paying real estate often weigh two of the most established net-lease landlords: NNN (NNN REIT, Inc., formerly National Retail Properties) and O (Realty Income Corporation). Both are real estate investment trusts (REITs) that own single-tenant properties under long-term, triple-net leases, where tenants cover most operating costs. This stock comparison is especially relevant for income-oriented investors and traders assessing relative performance, market positioning, and how each company navigates the current higher-for-longer interest-rate environment. Although they share a business model, their scale, portfolio mix, and recent momentum differ meaningfully, making the head-to-head comparison useful for portfolio allocation decisions.
NNN, based in Orlando, Florida, owns roughly 3,700 freestanding single-tenant retail properties across all 50 states, concentrated in convenience stores, restaurants, and automotive service centers. This tenant mix is generally viewed as resilient to e-commerce competition. In recent weeks, NNN has demonstrated steadier price action than many of its peers, with a year-to-date total return well ahead of the broader net-lease group and a dividend yield above 6%.
Fundamentals have remained solid: occupancy rose sequentially to about 98.6%, the company lifted its 2026 AFFO guidance to a range of $3.53 to $3.59 per share, and management reiterated its self-funded acquisition model. NNN has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years, one of only three REITs to achieve that streak. However, analyst sentiment has turned cautious, with several firms maintaining Sell or Underweight ratings amid concerns over slower growth, and insider selling activity has been reported. The stock trades near the lower half of its 52-week range.
O, Realty Income Corporation, is known as "The Monthly Dividend Company." It owns or holds interests in more than 15,500 properties leased to about 1,786 clients across 92 industries, spanning the U.S., the U.K., and continental Europe. Beyond traditional retail, it has increasingly allocated capital to industrial assets, a hyperscale data center joint venture, and credit investments such as mezzanine loans and preferred equity.
Realty Income's operating metrics have held up well in recent market activity: occupancy remains near 98.9%, and the company raised its 2026 AFFO guidance to roughly $4.44–$4.45 per share while declaring its 676th consecutive monthly dividend. Yet the stock has faced notable pressure, declining from above $66 earlier in the year toward the mid-$50s as rising Treasury yields raised borrowing costs and led some investors to rotate out of rate-sensitive REITs. The shares trade near the lower end of their 52-week range, with a dividend yield approaching 6%.
For traders seeking a systematic edge in names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of algorithmic strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest and most market-appropriate strategies earn a spot in this featured section. Each robot differs in trading style, timeframe, performance history, risk profile, and the specific set of stocks it trades, so investors can match a strategy to their own objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are currently favored.
The sharpest contrast between these two stocks is scale and diversification. NNN operates a focused, roughly $7.9 billion market-capitalization platform centered on U.S. retail, while O is an S&P 500 member with a market capitalization above $50 billion and a multi-industry, multi-geography footprint. Realty Income's broader exposure gives it more growth levers but also greater sensitivity to interest rates and share issuance, whereas NNN's self-funded model emphasizes capital discipline and a higher dividend yield.
On momentum, NNN has outperformed Realty Income over the trailing year-to-date period, partly because its retail-centric portfolio has been less exposed to the rate-driven repricing that hit larger, more acquisitive peers. On risk, Realty Income carries a longer record of consecutive monthly payouts and a Hold-weighted analyst consensus with a higher average price target, while NNN faces a more mixed-to-cautious analyst posture. For income, NNN currently offers the slightly richer yield; for diversification and scale, Realty Income offers the broader platform.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean slightly toward NNN in the current environment. Its relatively stronger recent relative performance, steadier trend consistency, higher dividend yield, and self-funded balance-sheet discipline present a more favorable near-term risk-adjusted profile than O, whose larger and more complex capital-deployment model is more exposed to rising borrowing costs. That said, the margin is narrow, and Realty Income's diversification, monthly dividend, and elevated consensus price target remain meaningful counterweights. The assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive and reflects current market conditions rather than a long-term quality judgment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
NNN saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 93 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 55 of the 93 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 59%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NNN's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NNN just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where NNN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 49 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
Following a +1.81% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NNN advanced for three days, in 140 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 46%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for NNN moved below the 200-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NNN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
NNN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for NNN entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NNN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 82 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.795) is normal, around the industry mean (2.718). P/E Ratio (20.552) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.982). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (19.520) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.059) settles around the average of (365.798) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (8.271) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for O turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where O's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where O's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 33 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on O as a result. In 42 of 80 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
Following a +1.65% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where O advanced for three days, in 152 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 47%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 7 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for O moved below the 200-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where O declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
O broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for O entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. O’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.361) is normal, around the industry mean (2.718). P/E Ratio (41.526) is within average values for comparable stocks, (34.982). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.792) is also within normal values, averaging (12.808). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (365.798) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (8.865) is also within normal values, averaging (6.739).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. O’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
NNN | O | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
O's Valuation (71) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NNN (82). This means that O’s stock grew similarly to NNN’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (74). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's SMR Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (86). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (57). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for O (76). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than O’s over the last 12 months.
| NNN | O | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 46% | 11 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 49% | 26 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 49% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while O’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while O’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
NNN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.28%.
NNN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
O is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HBRD | 23.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco U.S. Hybrid Bond ETF (HBRD) | |||
| AIOO | 26.48 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) | |||
| HYG | 77.05 | -0.05 | -0.06% |
| iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) | |||
| REZ | 91.55 | -0.19 | -0.21% |
| iShares Residential and Multisector Real Estate ETF (REZ) | |||
| FXG | 62.06 | -1.06 | -1.67% |
| First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) | |||