Advertisement
NNN vs O
Which Stock Would AI Choose? National Retail Properties (NNN) vs. Realty Income (O) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both NNN and O are retail-focused real estate investment trusts (REITs), specializing in net lease properties with stable, long-term tenant rents.
- O offers monthly dividends with a 670th consecutive payment, appealing to income seekers, while NNN pays quarterly.
- Recent market activity shows O with a year-to-date gain of about 15%, slightly ahead of NNN's 14%.
- NNN reported strong Q1 2026 adjusted funds from operations (AFFO), raising full-year guidance amid high occupancy of 98.6%.
- O boasts a larger market cap of $59.5 billion versus NNN's $8 billion, providing greater scale and diversification.
- Dividend yields hover around 5% for both, supporting their appeal in a yield-hungry market environment.
Introduction
National Retail Properties (NNN) and Realty Income (O) stand out as leading REITs in the net lease retail sector, where tenants cover most property expenses, delivering predictable cash flows. Investors seeking reliable dividends and exposure to resilient retail real estate often compare these stocks for their similar business models yet distinct scales and payout structures. This analysis suits income-oriented traders and long-term holders evaluating relative performance amid interest rate shifts and economic recovery signals in recent market activity. By examining recent trends, both offer insights into sector stability versus growth potential.
NNN Overview and Recent Performance
National Retail Properties (NNN), a REIT owning over 3,500 single-tenant retail properties across the U.S., emphasizes net leases with creditworthy tenants like service-oriented retailers. In recent weeks, NNN stock has shown resilience, gaining around 3% over the past month and 14% year-to-date, outperforming broader indices in shorter periods. Q1 2026 results highlighted AFFO of $0.87 per share, surpassing estimates, with occupancy rising to 98.6% and $145 million in investments at favorable cap rates. Raised full-year AFFO guidance to $3.53–$3.59 per share reflects acquisition momentum and rent growth, bolstering positive sentiment despite REIT sector pressures from rates.
O Overview and Recent Performance
Realty Income (O), known as "The Monthly Dividend Company," manages a vast portfolio of over 15,000 properties globally, with about 79% in retail net leases including diverse sectors like grocery and dollar stores. Recent stock behavior reflects steady gains, up approximately 15% year-to-date and trading near the upper end of its 52-week range of $54–$68. The company extended its dividend streak to 670 consecutive monthly payments, with a forward yield of 5.07%. Anticipation builds for Q1 earnings projecting $1.10 EPS, amid consistent revenue growth and a market cap underscoring its scale. Sentiment remains supported by low beta (0.76) and acquisition activity in recent market conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across various strategies. These bots employ diverse styles like momentum, trend trading, swing, and multi-agent systems on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, posting annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51%–88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Top bots target sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD), industrials, and small caps, with drawdowns managed from $1,500 to $49,000. This selection highlights bots best suited to current volatility and trends. Traders can explore these for automated signals tailored to market conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both NNN and O thrive on net lease models minimizing operational risks, but O's larger scale ($59B market cap vs. $8B) enables broader diversification beyond pure retail. Growth drivers include acquisitions: NNN at $145M recently, while O pursues global expansion. Recent momentum favors O slightly on YTD returns, though NNN shows stronger short-term gains amid earnings beats. Risk factors mirror REIT sensitivities to rates and tenant health, with O's lower beta offering stability. Sector exposure is retail-heavy for both, but O edges in sentiment from monthly payouts and size.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward O based on superior trend consistency, larger portfolio stability, and monthly dividend reliability amid recent positive relative positioning. Factors like higher YTD performance and extended payout history suggest stronger income appeal, though NNN remains competitive for quarterly yield hunters. This probabilistic edge reflects observable catalysts rather than guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NNN is a Buy and O is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- O’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NNN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while O’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NNN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- O’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NNN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
NNN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
O is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.77% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| NNN | O | NNN / O | |
| Capitalization | 8.47B | 58.2B | 15% |
| EBITDA | 871M | 4.91B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | 14.997 | 12.549 | 120% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.71 | 51.11 | 42% |
| Revenue | 936M | 5.88B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 4.57M | 374M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 4.85B | 30.2B | 16% |
NNN | O | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
O's Valuation (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NNN (80). This means that O’s stock grew similarly to NNN’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (63). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's SMR Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (88). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (52). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (48). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.
| NNN | O | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 42% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 9 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
O and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, O has been closely correlated with NNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if O jumps, then NNN could also see price increases.