NPAB
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
TRTLF
Price
$11.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

NPAB vs TRTLF

Header iconNPAB vs TRTLF Comparison
Open Charts NPAB vs TRTLFBanner chart's image
New Providence Acquisition
Price$10.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.14K
CapitalizationN/A
TortoiseEcofin Acquisition Corp. III
Price$11.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
NPAB vs TRTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPAB vs. TRTLF commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPAB is a Buy and TRTLF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (NPAB: $10.90 vs. TRTLF: $11.06)
Brand notoriety: NPAB and TRTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPAB: 51% vs. TRTLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NPAB: $124.16M vs. TRTLF: $279.09M
NPAB [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $124.16M. TRTLF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $279.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPAB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPAB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRTLF is a better buy in the long-term than NPAB.

Price Growth

NPAB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.68% price change this week, while TRTLF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

NPAB is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.24% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRTLF($279M) has a higher market cap than NPAB($124M). NPAB has higher P/E ratio than TRTLF: NPAB (59.89) vs TRTLF (37.17). TRTLF YTD gains are higher at: 4.143 vs. NPAB (2.540). NPAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.33M vs. TRTLF (-2.73M). NPAB has more cash in the bank: 56.9K vs. TRTLF (13.1K). NPAB has less debt than TRTLF: NPAB (290K) vs TRTLF (715K). NPAB (0) and TRTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NPABTRTLFNPAB / TRTLF
Capitalization124M279M44%
EBITDA-1.33M-2.73M49%
Gain YTD2.5404.14361%
P/E Ratio59.8937.17161%
Revenue00-
Total Cash56.9K13.1K434%
Total Debt290K715K41%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNXIX18.670.03
+0.16%
1290 Avantis U.S. Large Cap Growth I
AIEMX11.20N/A
N/A
Alger Emerging Markets I
DGEFX12.95-0.13
-0.99%
Destinations Equity Income I
LMOPX34.68-0.42
-1.20%
Patient Opportunity C
PDIFX14.02-0.23
-1.61%
Principal Diversified International R6

NPAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPAB has been loosely correlated with WINVU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPAB jumps, then WINVU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPAB
1D Price
Change %
NPAB100%
N/A
WINVU - NPAB
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ACAB - NPAB
40%
Loosely correlated
-46.79%
GBBK - NPAB
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
ADRT - NPAB
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WAVS - NPAB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

TRTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRTLF and GLAC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRTLF and GLAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRTLF
1D Price
Change %
TRTLF100%
N/A
GLAC - TRTLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPAB - TRTLF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APXI - TRTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
IVCA - TRTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOVVU - TRTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More