NPACF
Price
$18.10
Change
+$0.40 (+2.26%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
767.63M
PET
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
79.56M
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NPACF vs PET

Header iconNPACF vs PET Comparison
Open Charts NPACF vs PETBanner chart's image
Quadient SA
Price$18.10
Change+$0.40 (+2.26%)
Volume$800
Capitalization767.63M
Wag! Group
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$245
Capitalization79.56M
NPACF vs PET Comparison Chart
Loading...
PET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NPACF vs. PET commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPACF is a Hold and PET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NPACF: $18.10 vs. PET: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: NPACF and PET are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NPACF: 106% vs. PET: 0%
Market capitalization -- NPACF: $767.63M vs. PET: $79.56M
NPACF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $767.63M. PET’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $79.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NPACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NPACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PET is a better buy in the long-term than NPACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NPACF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PET (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

PET is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.16% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPACF($768M) has a higher market cap than PET($79.6M). NPACF has higher P/E ratio than PET: NPACF (9.60) vs PET (1.57). NPACF YTD gains are higher at: -3.209 vs. PET (-43.139). NPACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. PET (-4.69M). NPACF has more cash in the bank: 133M vs. PET (18.3M). PET has less debt than NPACF: PET (28.6M) vs NPACF (910M). NPACF has higher revenues than PET: NPACF (1.04B) vs PET (83.9M).
NPACFPETNPACF / PET
Capitalization768M79.6M965%
EBITDA228M-4.69M-4,865%
Gain YTD-3.209-43.1397%
P/E Ratio9.601.57609%
Revenue1.04B83.9M1,244%
Total Cash133M18.3M727%
Total Debt910M28.6M3,182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACF: Fundamental Ratings
NPACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESLOY148.101.54
+1.05%
EssilorLuxottica
KNRRY25.00-0.14
-0.54%
Knorr-Bremse
KNYJY31.72-0.41
-1.28%
Kone Oyj
MNTHY54.97-1.17
-2.08%
Minth Group, Ltd.
WSTRF0.60-0.03
-4.35%
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp.

NPACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACF has been loosely correlated with LKRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACF jumps, then LKRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACF
1D Price
Change %
NPACF100%
N/A
LKRY - NPACF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NRDY - NPACF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.58%
PUBM - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITK - NPACF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PET - NPACF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More