Ad is loading...
NPFCX vs RGPAX
NPFCX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.04
Change-$2.29 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$19.67
Change-$0.62 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets491.95M
NPFCX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGPAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Hold and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. RGPAX (492M). RGPAX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: RGPAX (0.41) vs NPFCX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: NPFCX (24 years) vs RGPAX (5 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: NPFCX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. NPFCX (1.31). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.15 vs. NPFCX (62.26).
| NPFCX | RGPAX | NPFCX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.00 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 8.52 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.984 | -1.933 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 492M | 28,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | 5.17 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.31 | 6.37 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.26 | 74.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...