Ad is loading...
NPFCX vs RGPAX
NPFCX vs RGPAX Comparison
Open Charts NPFCX vs RGPAX
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$55.75
Change+$0.86 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.87B
RBC Global Opportunities A
Price$19.58
Change+$0.20 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets482.92M
NPFCX vs RGPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFCX vs. RGPAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFCX is a Buy and RGPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. RGPAX (483M). RGPAX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: RGPAX (0.41) vs NPFCX (0.00). NPFCX was incepted earlier than RGPAX: NPFCX (24 years) vs RGPAX (5 years). RGPAX (8.52) is less costly to investors than NPFCX (1.48). RGPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGPAX: NPFCX (250) vs RGPAX (1000). RGPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. NPFCX (-0.34). RGPAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.37 vs. NPFCX (36.91).
| NPFCX | RGPAX | NPFCX / RGPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.00 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 8.52 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.199 | -6.332 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 483M | 27,536% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 3.17 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.46 | 9.62 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 45.37 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...