Ad is loading...
NPFFX vs SCGVX
NPFFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$57.93
Change+$1.02 (+1.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.58B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$27.33
Change+$0.44 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
NPFFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Hold and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. SCGVX (1.05B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: NPFFX (0.53) vs SCGVX (0.00). NPFFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: NPFFX (24 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCGVX: NPFFX (250) vs SCGVX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.73 vs. SCGVX (-10.98). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.59 vs. SCGVX (14.07).
| NPFFX | SCGVX | NPFFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.22 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.22 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.958 | -6.628 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 1.05B | 12,548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.73 | -10.98 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.59 | -3.15 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.59 | 14.07 | 324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.57 | 48.79 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...