Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPNAX vs RMEBX
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNAX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
Price$46.55
Change-$0.21 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NPNAX (8.07B). NPNAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NPNAX (1.81) vs RMEBX (1.16). NPNAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NPNAX (0.98). NPNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNAX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. NPNAX (7.51). NPNAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.66 vs. RMEBX (49.85).
| NPNAX | RMEBX | NPNAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.911 | 5.349 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.07B | 105B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.16 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 8.97 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.43 | 18.03 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.66 | 49.85 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.70 | 67.40 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement