Ad is loading...
NPNAX vs RMEBX
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNAX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
Price$45.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.89B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNAX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. NPNAX (7.89B). NPNAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NPNAX (1.87) vs RMEBX (1.21). NPNAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NPNAX (0.98). NPNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNAX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNAX (1000). RMEBX (5.19) and NPNAX (5.17) have marching annual gain over last year. NPNAX return over 5 years is better than : 80.79 vs. RMEBX (55.02).
| NPNAX | RMEBX | NPNAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.889 | 1.203 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.89B | 101B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | 5.19 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.33 | 16.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.79 | 55.02 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.17 | 58.89 | 92% |