Ad is loading...
NPNAX vs RMEBX
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNAX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
Price$43.76
Change+$0.73 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. NPNAX (7.55B). NPNAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NPNAX (1.80) vs RMEBX (1.18). NPNAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NPNAX (0.98). NPNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNAX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. NPNAX (1.36). NPNAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.05 vs. RMEBX (52.21).
| NPNAX | RMEBX | NPNAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.378 | -2.724 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 95.8B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.18 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.36 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.49 | 5.82 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.05 | 52.21 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.17 | 53.41 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers