Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPNAX vs RMEBX
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNAX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
Price$48.79
Change+$0.29 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.34B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NPNAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NPNAX (8.34B). NPNAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NPNAX (1.75) vs RMEBX (1.12). NPNAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NPNAX (0.98). NPNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNAX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNAX (1000). NPNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. RMEBX (11.31). NPNAX return over 5 years is better than : 86.04 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| NPNAX | RMEBX | NPNAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.07 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.422 | 9.495 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.34B | 109B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.12 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 11.31 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.24 | 28.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.04 | 60.65 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.15 | 77.57 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement