Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
NPNAX vs RMFCX
NPNAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NPNAX vs RMFCX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value A
Price$48.65
Change+$0.29 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.34
Change+$0.37 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NPNAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NPNAX (9.14B). NPNAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: NPNAX (2.03) vs RMFCX (1.69). NPNAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NPNAX (14 years) vs RMFCX (22 years). NPNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNAX: RMFCX (250) vs NPNAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.55 vs. NPNAX (20.64). NPNAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.94 vs. RMFCX (48.17).
| NPNAX | RMFCX | NPNAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.812 | 18.660 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 105B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.69 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.64 | 22.55 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.11 | 17.46 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.94 | 48.17 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.44 | 67.23 | 56% |