Ad is loading...
NPNCX vs RMEBX
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C
Price$45.48
Change+$0.12 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.89B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNCX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. NPNCX (7.89B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NPNCX: RMEBX (1.21) vs NPNCX (1.08). NPNCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NPNCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NPNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNCX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. NPNCX (4.40). NPNCX return over 5 years is better than : 74.37 vs. RMEBX (55.02).
| NPNCX | RMEBX | NPNCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.621 | 1.203 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.89B | 101B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 5.19 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 16.77 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.37 | 55.02 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.30 | 58.89 | 60% |