Ad is loading...
NPNCX vs RMEBX
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C
Price$47.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. NPNCX (9.12B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NPNCX: RMEBX (1.54) vs NPNCX (1.31). NPNCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNCX (14 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). NPNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNCX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.63 vs. NPNCX (20.12). NPNCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.36 vs. RMEBX (46.16).
| NPNCX | RMEBX | NPNCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.171 | 18.086 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.12B | 106B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.12 | 23.63 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.81 | 16.95 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.36 | 46.16 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.14 | 67.42 | 22% |