Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPNCX vs RMEBX
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C
Price$48.68
Change+$0.28 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.34B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NPNCX (8.34B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NPNCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs NPNCX (1.01). NPNCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NPNCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NPNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNCX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNCX (1000). NPNCX (11.54) and RMEBX (11.31) have marching annual gain over last year. NPNCX return over 5 years is better than : 79.43 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| NPNCX | RMEBX | NPNCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.986 | 9.495 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.34B | 109B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | 11.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.52 | 28.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.43 | 60.65 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.20 | 77.57 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers