Ad is loading...
NPNCX vs RMEBX
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NPNCX vs RMEBX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value C
Price$44.11
Change+$2.54 (+6.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.19B
NPNCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPNCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPNCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 92.2B vs. NPNCX (7.32B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NPNCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs NPNCX (1.04). NPNCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NPNCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NPNCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NPNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NPNCX: RMEBX (250) vs NPNCX (1000). NPNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.23 vs. RMEBX (-4.56). NPNCX return over 5 years is better than : 64.99 vs. RMEBX (44.36).
| NPNCX | RMEBX | NPNCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.07 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.786 | -7.747 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.32B | 92.2B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.18 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.23 | -4.56 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.38 | -1.07 | 780% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.99 | 44.36 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.60 | 44.99 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...