Ad is loading...
NSBAX vs RWMFX
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBAX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Dividend Growth A
Price$62.82
Change+$0.78 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.33B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.06
Change+$0.83 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.61B
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Mar 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. NSBAX (6.33B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: RWMFX (1.70) vs NSBAX (1.01). NSBAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBAX (19 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSBAX (17.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). NSBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. RWMFX (6.51). NSBAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.24 vs. RWMFX (53.75).
| NSBAX | RWMFX | NSBAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.042 | 2.763 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.33B | 196B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 6.51 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.63 | 15.96 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.24 | 53.75 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.81 | 60.28 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers